Dressing for the dock: the psychology of courtroom style

Anna Sorokins demure designer wardrobe, Felicity Huffmans sensible cardigan, Harvey Weinsteins loose button it is impossible to separate clothing from court optics

Scammer, con artist, grifter. All words used to describe Anna Sorokin, the fake heiress sentenced to four to 12 years imprisonment for swindling more than $200,000, although style icon is the label that has endured, at least in fashion circles.

*****************************************************

Recommended For You

TubeTarget Pro Trial

TubeTarget is the perfect new solution for this market. Right from Ecom marketers, lead marketers to all the people who have been advertising on Facebook and other social platforms, this is the perfect product to help them add a new dimension to their mar

AffiliateNinjaPro Scale

A Cloud Based App That Creates INSTANT 1-Click Profitable Affiliate Funnels to Build You a HUGE List and Gets Targeted Traffic and Affiliate Commissions on 100% Autopilot.

*****************************************************

Since attending trial at Manhattan state court wearing her oversized Celine spectacles, black choker, and a roll call of womenswear by Saint Laurent, Victoria Beckham, Michael Kors and Chloe, Sorokins demure wardrobe has been more talked about than her crimes. This was intentional. Sorokins lawyer raised concerns over the Rikers prison-issued uniform and enlisted the help of Anastasia Walker Courtney Loves stylist, no less to help her guide the jurys eyes and minds.

The clothes were borrowed, but Sorokin kept her specs for consistency. It implies how deep this attachment to designer gear goes, says Susanna Cordner, a fashion curator and senior research fellow at the London College of Fashion because when it comes to image-management, its impossible to separate clothing from optics.

We know Sorokin uses clothes as a code, as a power play to make people feel certain ways about her, she continues. So this is the next persona in that series, says Cordner. And, here, clothes can be used to convey two personality positions: to cement a character or to question one.

Felicity
Felicity Huffman departs federal court in her sensible mom cardie. Photograph: Steven Senne/AP

Courtroom fashion has a long and varied history, particularly when it comes to well-known defendants. Last week David Beckham made a brief but elegant appearance at Bromley magistrates court to hear charges of using a phone while driving, his charcoal grey suit and matching tie (possibly Dior) suggesting sober deference to the law. Meanwhile, in Boston, the actor Felicity Huffman wore a sensible mom oatmeal cardigan over a grey dress for her tearful guilty plea. Two different approaches to courtroom fashion, although neither was successful; Beckham lost his licence for six months, and Huffman can expect prison or electronic monitoring.

Sometimes, Cordner says, clothing is even used to emote something beyond the evidence. By the time the alleged Theranos fraudster Elizabeth Holmes made it to trial, she had ditched her red lipstick and Steve Jobs-style black turtleneck for a largely cream wardrobe as if to say: I couldnt possibly have. Ditto Naomi Campbell, testifying at former Liberian president Charles Taylors war crime trial in 2012 because who would handle dirty diamonds in a cream Alaa cardigan. Remember, too, Winona Ryder wearing Marc Jacobs after having allegedly shoplifted Marc Jacobs in 2002 (in a neat twist, the designer later cast her in his spring/summer 2003 ad campaign), and Ted Bundys comically sized bowtie, because what serial killer would dress like a clown?

Styling does not work for everyone, though. Take Harvey Weinstein, whose arraignment look last year seemed a bid to shift the focus from power to pity, turning up to court in the avuncular twinset of V-neck jumper and white shirt with a button hanging off. If he was gunning for sympathy as a man visibly reduced by his crimes, it may not have washed. Obviously, in some cases this is sincere, and in others it is choreographed, says Cordner.

Celebrities are virtually conditioned to dress up for any public appearance, and courtrooms are places of justice but also judgment. These days, high-profile trials are often televised and the celebrity car-to-courtroom pap shot has become as iconic as the hotel-to-car pap shot and many A-listers use stylists for the latter. The inescapable point is: in this social media age, you are dressing for Instagram, but almost always to influence too.

*****************************************************

Recommended For You

xLinks Cloaking Pro Commercial - World's Smartest Link Cloaking Cloud App Which bypass google and ya

(Handle Clients Mailing and Make 5k to 10k per month) xLinks Cloaking Pro Commercial - World's Smartest Link Cloaking Cloud App Which bypass google and yahoo to give you 500% more profits.

Facebook Automationn Tools

Complete Facebook Marketing Suite

PicturesCRATE Advanced

130,000+ Media Graphics that can be Edited and Enhanced via our Powerful Image Editor

*****************************************************

Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

This post was curated & Posted using : RealSpecific

Thank you for taking the time to read our article.

If you enjoyed our content, we'd really appreciate some "love" with a share or two.

And ... Don't forget to have fun!

Recommended

AdsCrisp Enigma Monthly Commercial

Unlimited Templates Club Access Plus and VidCrisp - Psychological Conversion Triggers!!

MOTO Theme - powerful & versatile WordPress theme.

Top WordPress Developers FINALLY Share Their CUSTOM Site Theme That?s Driven Millions Of Sales For Thousands Of Global Clients ?

Stockocity 4K FX Pro 2000 3840x2160 Background Vids + 6000 Pics + 6000 Anims

Stockocity 4K FX Pro - 2000 3840x2160 background videos + 6000 4K resolution images + 6000 GIF animations

Leave a Reply